Technique · Chiropractic Care

Koren Specific Technique (KST)

Koren Specific Technique (KST) is a systematic chiropractic assessment and correction method developed by Dr. Tedd Koren that uses the Arthrostim instrument and a structured scanning protocol to locate and address subluxations (spinal misalignments that interfere with nervous system function) throughout the entire spine and cranium. Because the instrument delivers a precise, repeatable impulse rather than a manual thrust, KST can be performed with the patient seated, standing, or lying down, making it accessible to a wide range of patients. At applies KST as part of a patient-centered approach that draws on nearly three decades of clinical experience. The technique suits patients who want low-force care without sacrificing specificity.

What it is

Koren Specific Technique centers on a three-step protocol: challenging a segment to determine whether it is subluxated, confirming the direction of correction needed, and then delivering the chiropractic adjustment (spinal manipulation). The assessment relies on a binary muscle response, sometimes called an indicator muscle test, in which the body's neurological response guides the clinician toward the exact spinal level and vector requiring correction. Once identified, each subluxated segment receives a chiropractic adjustment delivered through the Arthrostim, a handheld percussive instrument that produces a rapid series of low-force thrusts. This percussion maintains a consistent mechanical input while avoiding the larger-amplitude forces associated with traditional high-velocity low-amplitude techniques. [8]

KST systematically addresses not only the cervical (neck), thoracic (mid-back), and lumbar (low-back) spine but also the cranial sutures, sacrum, and temporomandibular joints. Because each scan begins at the occiput and moves down to the sacrum, the protocol rarely misses a level that contributes to a patient's pattern of dysfunction. The instrument-based delivery means the clinician can adjust without rotating or extending the patient's spine to an end range, which is a meaningful consideration for individuals with degenerative joint changes or osteoporosis. [8] Patients who have found traditional manual adjustments uncomfortable, or who have previously worked with Activator Method approaches, often adapt quickly to KST's similar instrument-based feel.

What to expect

A KST session typically begins with the patient seated upright so that normal gravitational loading is present during the scan. works through the spinal column and cranium in sequence, applying a light challenge at each segment and reading the neurological indicator response before deciding whether a correction is warranted. Because the patient remains in a neutral, weight-bearing position, postural patterns that would disappear on a flat table remain visible and addressable. Each correction takes a fraction of a second, and most patients report a mild tapping sensation rather than the audible pop or rotational movement they may associate with other forms of chiropractic adjustment.

Session length varies with complexity. A straightforward maintenance visit may take fifteen to twenty minutes. An initial corrective appointment, during which baseline patterns are documented, typically runs longer. Some patients notice an immediate shift in muscle tension or range of motion after the first visit. Others experience a gradual change over several sessions as the nervous system adapts to the corrected alignment. Mild post-treatment soreness, similar to the feeling after light exercise, occasionally occurs during the first few visits and generally resolves within a day. For patients whose care also includes , KST can be sequenced before or after that session depending on what the clinical assessment indicates.

Key benefits

Who benefits most

Patients presenting with Neck Pain or Headaches & Migraines often respond well to KST because the protocol specifically addresses cervical and cranial segments that conventional lumbar-focused assessments may underweight. The same systematic scan covers the upper cervical spine, where atlas and axis subluxations contribute to cervicogenic headache patterns. Patients managing Low Back Pain benefit from the sacral and lumbar components of the scan, particularly when pelvic unleveling is part of their presentation. Because the correction occurs in a seated position that mirrors daily posture, the adjusted segments are immediately tested under real functional loading rather than deloaded on a table. [1]

KST is particularly well-suited to patients who require ongoing maintenance care, those returning from prior injury with residual sensitization, and individuals who have had prior spinal surgeries where manual thrusting near instrumented levels is inadvisable. Pediatric patients tolerate the light percussion of the Arthrostim well, and elderly patients benefit from the avoidance of rotational stress on fragile facet joints. Patients already familiar with Torque Release Technique (TRT) technique will recognize a similar philosophy of specificity and low-force application, though the scanning protocol and instrument dynamics differ. For anyone uncertain whether KST is appropriate given their history, provides background on's clinical training and approach.

How it connects to chiropractic

The theoretical foundation of KST sits within the broader chiropractic model of the vertebral subluxation complex, where restricted or misaligned spinal segments alter afferent (sensory input traveling to the brain) and efferent (motor output leaving the brain) neural traffic. Research on spinal manipulative therapy documents that mechanical interventions at segmental levels produce measurable neurophysiological effects, including changes in muscle spindle activity and alterations in pain-processing pathways. [3] KST's use of a percussive instrument rather than a manual thrust does not diminish these mechanisms. The Arthrostim's rapid impulse sequence still introduces a mechanical deformation at the targeted facet joint and surrounding soft tissue, which is the physical stimulus responsible for the downstream neurological response.

The chiropractic literature increasingly values technique flexibility, recognizing that no single delivery method suits every patient. Survey data and clinical guidelines within the profession note that non-high-velocity low-amplitude techniques, including instrument-assisted methods, are recommended when patient characteristics such as age, bone density, or pain sensitivity make traditional thrusting inadvisable. [8] KST aligns directly with that recommendation while preserving the specificity that distinguishes chiropractic adjustment from general mobilization. The structured scan protocol means the clinician applies the instrument only where the assessment confirms a subluxation is present, avoiding indiscriminate treatment of unaffected segments.

Published research on instrument-assisted adjustment shares methodological terrain with studies on manual spinal manipulative therapy. A systematic review of chiropractic evidence found consistent study of musculoskeletal conditions across cervical and lumbar regions, and publication rates in the field have trended upward as researchers examine refined subsets of technique, patient type, and outcome measure. [7] This growing body of work supports the clinical rationale for individualized, assessment-driven correction rather than a one-size protocol. KST's built-in assessment step, which precedes every individual correction, reflects exactly that evidence-based standard.

Patients who have previously received care for musculoskeletal conditions under a generalized protocol sometimes report that KST produces different results because the scan identifies segments that prior care left uncorrected. The cranial component of the scan is one example. Upper cervical and cranial corrections are underrepresented in many chiropractic protocols, yet the suboccipital region carries dense mechanoreceptor populations that influence balance, proprioception, and cervicogenic pain. Addressing these levels as part of every visit, rather than only when the patient reports cranial symptoms, distinguishes KST from more symptom-driven approaches. [2] For patients whose presentation includes tension-type headache or post-concussive sensitivity, this comprehensive scan architecture may reach levels that shorter protocols miss.

At, KST is available as a primary technique or in combination with other depending on what the clinical assessment indicates. Patients who want specificity, low-force delivery, and a structured scan at every visit consistently select it over manual alternatives once they understand the protocol. For details on scheduling a KST assessment with, see .

Learn About Our Approach

Common questions

Does KST hurt?
Most patients describe the sensation as a light tapping or mild pressure at each spinal level. The Arthrostim delivers a rapid, low-force impulse, so there is no rotational movement or audible pop. Some patients feel mild muscle soreness after the first couple of visits, similar to how muscles feel after light exercise. That typically clears within a day.
How is KST different from the Activator Method?
Both KST and the Activator Method use handheld instruments to deliver low-force corrections, so patients often find the feel similar. The main difference is in the assessment protocol. KST uses a structured full-spine and cranial scan at every visit, working systematically from the occiput to the sacrum. The Activator Method uses its own proprietary leg-length and muscle testing protocol. can explain which approach fits your clinical picture.
How many visits are usually needed before noticing a change?
This varies by condition, how long the problem has been present, and individual physiology. Some patients notice a shift in tension or range of motion after the first session. Others see gradual improvement over several weeks. reassesses at each visit, so the plan adjusts as your spine responds to care rather than following a fixed number of visits regardless of progress.
Patients throughout your area and the surrounding area can receive Koren Specific Technique care at.

Sources

  1. [1] goertz_41482869_pmc
    specific smt techniques and ces, or patient selection criteria when determining whether to administer smt or exercise. additional surveys exploring how chiropractors might modify treatments for patients with lumbar disc herniation would also be valuable [ 66 ]. finally, given…
  2. [2] haas_17716373_pmc
    a long and rich history in chiropractic [ 1, 16 ]. many chiropractors report use of the technique in some form [ 17, 18 ]. clearly, ak is viewed by its proponents as more than standard orthopedic / neurological muscle testing. mmt, as performed by chiropractors, does not…
  3. [3] bronfort_7728627_pmc
    for future research although we found consistent evidence that smt is not efficacious or effective for the management of non - msk conditions, our conclusions are based on a limited number of high and acceptable quality rcts. therefore, more and better rcts should be conducted…
  4. [4] chiropracticforh00crjo
    ., may 24. 1922. to whom it may concern : in appreciation of the wonderful success of the chiro¬ practic adjustments given me iby dr. c. r. johnston, of peekskill, n. y., i write this testimonial for the benefit of other sufferers. for several years i suffered from that most…
  5. [5] bronfort_29481979_pmc
    obligations or inability to meet study requirements, litigation, pregnancy, neck or headache care with smt / massage / exercise in the prior 3 months or other treatment in the prior 4 weeks from a licensed professional, regular analgesic or corticosteroid use, and other types of…
  6. [6] haas_29481979_pmc
    inability to meet study requirements, litigation, pregnancy, neck or headache care with smt / massage / exercise in the prior 3 months or other treatment in the prior 4 weeks from a licensed professional, regular analgesic or corticosteroid use, and other types of headache with…
  7. [7] goertz_39407729_pmc
    2013 - 2024 ). we identified 6286 articles on chiropractic. the rate of publication trended upward. keywords initially related to historical evolution, scope of practice, medicolegal, and regulatory aspects evolved to include randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews.…
  8. [8] goertz_31257002_pmc
    or greater joint stiffness. modifications recommended include non - hvla techniques, increased surface area contact, alternate positioning for adjustments, and using drop piecesmodifications can be made to increase patient safety when considering chiropractic care for older…

Find a chiropractor for Koren Specific Technique (KST) near you

0 InnateScan practices listed
Browse listed practices →

Or scan your spine first

Take a free 60-second posture screening — see where you stand.

Take a free spine screening →

Educational content only — not a medical diagnosis. Consult a licensed healthcare provider for evaluation.